Khác biệt giữa bản sửa đổi của “Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Magic/Horcrux”

Nội dung được xóa Nội dung được thêm vào
Chazz (thảo luận | đóng góp)
n Moved list of Horcruxes to below Greater Picture / Advanced warning
Dòng 47:
Until the seventh book, we are unsure of the fifth Horcrux; we don't yet have any theory as to what it could be or how it was created. One fan site had suggested that the artifact in question is [[Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Characters/Rowena Ravenclaw|Rowena Ravenclaw]]'s wand, and that this is the "one, solitary wand" that rests in [[Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Characters/Ollivander|Ollivander's]] shop window; this was suggested to have something to do with the disappearance of Mr. Ollivander in ''Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince''. In that case, the murder that created the Horcrux could well have happened in Diagon Alley. This turns out to be incorrect; the fifth Horcrux is an artifact that we don't learn about until the seventh book: Rowena Ravenclaw's lost diadem.
 
We believe that it was Voldemort's intent to create the sixth and final Horcrux from the death of Harry Potter. It is possible that he would have been carrying the artifact that he meant to convert into a Horcrux with him, and it would have remained when he died; it could have been found in [[Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Places/Godric's Hollow|Godric's Hollow]] when Harry goes to investigate there. Harry, however, does not enter his parentparents's house, only looking at it from outside the overgrown hedge.
 
Thwarted by Harry, Voldemort apparently used the death of [[Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Characters/Bertha Jorkins|Bertha Jorkins]] to create a final Horcrux, which Dumbledore believes is now in [[Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Characters/Nagini|Nagini]]. There is a risk, of course, in that it is easier to destroy a living being and thus the embedded soul, but Voldemort would have been low on resources at this point, and unable to choose from a very wide selection of artifacts. In passing, we do see one of Dumbledore's very rare mistakes here; Dumbledore says that Voldemort used Nagini to kill Frank Bryce, and may have created a Horcrux at that time. This would imply that it is not necessary to kill someone directly in order to create a Horcrux; ordering another to do the killing would be sufficient, perhaps with the proviso that the being ordered to do the killing must not be sentient. However, reading the end of chapter 1 of [[Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Books/Goblet of Fire/Chapter 1|Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire]], we see that in fact Voldemort did kill Frank Bryce with the Avada Kedavra curse. Thus, even if Bryce's death had resulted in creation of a Horcrux, we wouldn't know if directly murdering someone is necessary to the Horcrux creation spell. The author's saying that the Diary Horcrux was made by way of Moaning Myrtle's death, which was caused by the Basilisk, rather than directly by Riddle, does rather confirm that use of an agent to do the murdering does not prevent creation of a Horcrux.