Khác biệt giữa bản sửa đổi của “Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Magic/Unforgivable Curses”

Nội dung được xóa Nội dung được thêm vào
Chazz (thảo luận | đóng góp)
Rejected the last text change (by 173.209.211.223) and restored revision 2584032 by Chazz
{{BookCat}}
Dòng 32:
Given the harshness of the penalty, one wonders then why, in the later books in the series, there seem to be Cruciatus and Killing curses flying around so frequently, and so many wizards affected by the Imperius curse. We have to assume that the author is making a point, that the laws really only affect the behaviour of the law-abiding citizens, and that increasing the penalty does not seem to have much affect on those who would break the law anyway. It also, perhaps, is meant to expose the folly of statutory minimum sentences, as we suspect that Harry had no alternative except to use the Imperius curse to enter Gringotts. Given that the curse should trigger an automatic life sentence in Azkaban, and no mention is made of allowance for extenuating circumstances, Harry should have been sent directly to prison, and definitely would not have gone on to have a career as an [[Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Magic/Auror|Auror]].
 
{{BookCat}}
[[Category:Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter]]